Blog Articles - SkiChatter

Glen Hunt Glen Hunt

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager日本語版サンプル & ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager模擬対策

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager試験問題を購入する前に、無料でダウンロードして試してみることができます。また、WebサイトのISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager学習ガイドのページにアクセスして、ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager試験問題を理解することができます。 Fast2testのISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerガイドトレントのページはデモを提供し、タイトルの一部とソフトウェアの形式を理解できます。そのため、購入する前にISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager試験問題を理解し、ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager試験問題を購入するかどうかを決定できます。

PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager 認定試験の出題範囲：

トピック
出題範囲

トピック 1

情報セキュリティリスク管理プログラムの実装: このドメインでは、組織のフレームワーク内でセキュリティリスクを認識、評価、および軽減する手順を含む、リスク管理プログラムの設定と運用化の手順について説明します。

トピック 2

情報セキュリティリスク管理の基本原則と概念: このドメインでは、情報セキュリティにおけるリスク管理の背後にある基本的な考え方と中核要素を取り上げ、貴重なデータと IT リソースを保護するための潜在的な脅威を特定して軽減することに重点を置いています。

トピック 3

ISO
IEC 27005 に基づく情報セキュリティリスク管理フレームワークとプロセス: ISO
IEC 27005 を中心に据えたこのドメインは、情報セキュリティリスクを管理するための構造化されたガイドラインを提供し、国際的な慣行に沿った体系的かつ標準化されたアプローチを促進します。

トピック 4

その他の情報セキュリティリスク評価方法: このドメインでは、ISO
IEC 27005 を超えて、リスクを評価および管理するための代替方法を検討し、組織が特定の要件とリスクプロファイルに最適なツールとフレームワークを選択できるようにします。

>> ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager日本語版サンプル <<

PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager模擬対策、ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerブロンズ教材

すべての顧客の誠実な要件を考慮して、ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerテスト問題は、高品質の製品、思いやりのあるアフターサービスを備えた候補者に約束します。試験での99％の合格率、購入前の無料トライアル、安全なプライバシー保護など、ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerトレーニング資料の多くの利点がよく認識されています。お客様の視点から、最適なISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager模擬試験へのすべてのお客様の信頼とフィードバックを大切にし、最良の選択になります。

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager 認定 ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager 試験問題 (Q27-Q32):

質問 # 27
According to ISO/IEC 27005, what is the input when selecting information security risk treatment options?

A. A list of prioritized risks with event or risk scenarios that lead to those risks
B. A list of risks with level values assigned
C. A risk treatment plan and residual risks subject to the acceptance decision

正解：A

解説：
According to ISO/IEC 27005, the input for selecting information security risk treatment options should include a list of prioritized risks along with the specific event or risk scenarios that led to those risks. This information helps decision-makers understand the context and potential impact of each risk, allowing them to choose the most appropriate treatment options. Option A is incorrect because the risk treatment plan and residual risks are outputs, not inputs, of the risk treatment process. Option C is incorrect because a list of risks with level values assigned provides limited context for selecting appropriate treatment options.

質問 # 28
Scenario 3: Printary is an American company that offers digital printing services. Creating cost-effective and creative products, the company has been part of the printing industry for more than 30 years. Three years ago, the company started to operate online, providing greater flexibility for its clients. Through the website, clients could find information about all services offered by Printary and order personalized products. However, operating online increased the risk of cyber threats, consequently, impacting the business functions of the company. Thus, along with the decision of creating an online business, the company focused on managing information security risks. Their risk management program was established based on ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines and industry best practices.
Last year, the company considered the integration of an online payment system on its website in order to provide more flexibility and transparency to customers. Printary analyzed various available solutions and selected Pay0, a payment processing solution that allows any company to easily collect payments on their website. Before making the decision, Printary conducted a risk assessment to identify and analyze information security risks associated with the software. The risk assessment process involved three phases: identification, analysis, and evaluation. During risk identification, the company inspected assets, threats, and vulnerabilities. In addition, to identify the information security risks, Printary used a list of the identified events that could negatively affect the achievement of information security objectives. The risk identification phase highlighted two main threats associated with the online payment system: error in use and data corruption After conducting a gap analysis, the company concluded that the existing security controls were sufficient to mitigate the threat of data corruption. However, the user interface of the payment solution was complicated, which could increase the risk associated with user errors, and, as a result, impact data integrity and confidentiality.
Subsequently, the risk identification results were analyzed. The company conducted risk analysis in order to understand the nature of the identified risks. They decided to use a quantitative risk analysis methodology because it would provide more detailed information. The selected risk analysis methodology was consistent with the risk evaluation criteri a. Firstly, they used a list of potential incident scenarios to assess their potential impact. In addition, the likelihood of incident scenarios was defined and assessed. Finally, the level of risk was defined as low.
In the end, the level of risk was compared to the risk evaluation and acceptance criteria and was prioritized accordingly.
Which of the following situations indicates that Printary identified consequences of risk scenarios? Refer to scenario 3.

A. Printary used the list of potential incident scenarios and assessed their impact on company's information security
B. Printary concluded that the complicated user interface could increase the risk of user error and impact data integrity and confidentiality
C. Printary identified two main threats associated with the online payment system: error in use and corruption of data

正解：A

解説：
According to ISO/IEC 27005, the risk management process involves identifying, analyzing, and evaluating risks in a structured manner. Specifically, risk identification entails recognizing potential threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences to information assets. Once risks are identified, ISO/IEC 27005 emphasizes the importance of risk analysis, where risks are assessed in terms of their potential consequences and likelihood.
In the scenario, Printary followed this structured approach, aligning with the ISO/IEC 27005 framework. First, they identified the threats associated with the online payment system, which were categorized as user errors and data corruption. However, identification of threats alone does not equate to identifying the consequences of risk scenarios, as required by the risk analysis phase in ISO/IEC 27005.
The key to recognizing that Printary identified the consequences lies in the fact that they "used the list of potential incident scenarios and assessed their impact on the company's information security." This directly corresponds to ISO/IEC 27005's guidelines on risk analysis, where organizations must evaluate both the likelihood and the impact (consequences) of potential incidents on their assets. In other words, by assessing the impact of the incident scenarios, Printary is analyzing the consequences of the identified risks, which is a crucial step in the risk analysis process.
Option A refers to identifying a risk (user error leading to compromised data integrity and confidentiality), but this does not constitute a comprehensive analysis of the risk's consequences as per ISO/IEC 27005. Similarly, Option C highlights the identification of threats, but the threats themselves are not the consequences of risk scenarios.
Thus, Option B is the most accurate as it reflects Printary's alignment with ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines in assessing the potential consequences of risk scenarios by evaluating their impact on the company's information security.

質問 # 29
What are opportunities?

A. Occurrence or change of a particular set of circumstances
B. Combination of circumstances expected to be favorable to objectives
C. Outcome of an event affecting objectives

正解：B

解説：
Opportunities, according to ISO standards such as ISO 31000, are situations or conditions that have the potential to provide a favorable impact on achieving objectives. They represent circumstances that, when leveraged, can lead to beneficial outcomes for the organization, such as competitive advantage, growth, or improved performance. Option B is correct as it accurately describes opportunities as circumstances expected to be favorable to achieving objectives. Option A (Occurrence or change of a particular set of circumstances) is a more general definition that could apply to both risks and opportunities, while Option C (Outcome of an event affecting objectives) is more aligned with the concept of risk.

質問 # 30
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on scenario 6, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk and risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing this risk.
Based on the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005, is this acceptable?

A. No, the top management should manage the residual risk
B. Yes, risk owners must be aware of the residual risk and accept the responsibility for managing it
C. No, risk approvers are responsible for managing the residual risk after accepting it

正解：B

解説：
ISO/IEC 27005 specifies that once a risk treatment has been applied and residual risk remains, it is essential that the risk owner is aware of this residual risk and accepts the responsibility for managing it. The risk owner is the individual or entity accountable for managing specific risks within the organization. In Scenario 6, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk and assigned risk owners the responsibility for managing it, which is fully compliant with ISO/IEC 27005. Thus, the correct answer is A.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which states that risk owners should be aware of and accept responsibility for managing residual risks.

質問 # 31
Which of the following statements best defines information security risk?

A. Potential cause of an unwanted incident related to information security that can cause harm to an organization
B. Weakness of an asset or control that can be exploited by one or a group of threats
C. The potential that threats will exploit vulnerabilities of an information asset and cause harm to an organization

正解：C

解説：
Information security risk, as defined by ISO/IEC 27005, is "the potential that a threat will exploit a vulnerability of an asset or group of assets and thereby cause harm to the organization." This definition emphasizes the interplay between threats (e.g., cyber attackers, natural disasters), vulnerabilities (e.g., weaknesses in software, inadequate security controls), and the potential impact or harm that could result from this exploitation. Therefore, option A is the most comprehensive and accurate description of information security risk. In contrast, option B describes a vulnerability, and option C focuses on the cause of an incident rather than defining risk itself. Option A aligns directly with the risk definition in ISO/IEC 27005.

質問 # 32
......

世界経済の急速な発展に伴い、ますます多くの人々が社会的エリートになることを切望していることが広く受け入れられています。 ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager最新の学習ガイド資料は、ソーシャルエリートになりたい多くの人々の近道となります。 ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager試験の準備に最善を尽くし、短時間で関連する認定を取得すれば、私たちのような大企業の多くのリーダーから注目を集めることが容易になり、非常に簡単になります。 ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager学習ガイドの助けを借りて、多くの人々が労働市場で適切な仕事を得ることができます。

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager模擬対策: https://jp.fast2test.com/ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager-premium-file.html

Glen Hunt Glen Hunt

Biography

CONTACT

Quick Links